In a recent interview, a science editor from a major publication has come out in defense of peer review and the current climate of scientific publishing. “The peer review process is essential to ensuring that scientific papers are of the highest quality, and it’s something that should be respected and maintained,” said the editor. He went on to say that the current system is reliable, and that the peer review process should be viewed as a critical part of the scientific process. He also noted that the peer review process allows for more voices to be heard, and helps to ensure that papers are accurate and unbiased.

The editor also addressed the criticism that the process is too slow and too expensive. He argued that this is an unfair characterization, and that the process has become faster and more efficient in recent years. He stressed that peer review is still the best way to ensure that the scientific papers published are of the highest quality, and that the current system is reliable and should be respected.

Read Full Article Here

source: Phys.org