In recent years, the debate over the use of high-stakes exams in education has become increasingly contentious. The proponents of high-stakes exams claim that they are necessary for ensuring accountability and providing an objective measure of student achievement. However, the evidence does not necessarily support these arguments. Studies have shown that high-stakes exams often fail to accurately measure student achievement, are highly susceptible to cheating, and can lead to an emphasis on rote memorization over meaningful learning. Furthermore, the use of high-stakes exams can lead to increased stress and anxiety among students, as well as widening disparities in educational outcomes for students from disadvantaged backgrounds.

In light of this evidence, it is difficult to justify the continued use of high-stakes exams in education. While it is important for schools to be held accountable for student performance, there are better ways to achieve this goal without relying on high-stakes exams. It is time for educators and policy makers to rethink their approach to assessment and find more equitable and effective alternatives.

Read Full Article Here

source: Phys.org